That's not how logic and evidence work.
Proving a negative is often an
Argument from Ignorance (or
argumentum ad ignorantiam). It mistakenly treats an absence of evidence as evidence of absence, shifting the burden of proof onto the person demanding proof rather than the person making the assertion. Were the assertion is what needs to be proven.
I am all for getting rid of thieving, bad behaving suppliers asap. But you have to do it corrctly with at least minimal of evidence.
There is at least one suppler here that was exelent that dissapeared, but still fulfilled most is not all orders.
Anyway Monica fucked up and I want the admins to see some evidence to take action is she exit scammed while doing so.