Please Scroll Down to see Community
napsgear
UGL OZ
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
YOURMUSCLESHOP
UGFREAK
napsgearUGL OZ domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsYOURMUSCLESHOPUGFREAK

scammer or not??

you should stick with approved ones so wish you have no need to post this kind of threads next time
:)
What you mean do post this? It’s a legit question.. Aasraw literally has APPROVED in a big red box beside it in many places here
 
Hopefully I’m missing something and plz forgive me if I am. How is Aasraw on the list of scammers & an approved site?
Can you kindly provide a link to where this source is listed as both a scammer and approve site?
 
Sorry I’m not entirely sure how to add the links. I’m not pushing either way on this either, I am just genuinely curious. I had had contacted initially bc it seamed approved but I seen the other after & am not taking any chance unless I know is safe. Thanks
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4192.png
    IMG_4192.png
    1.7 MB · Views: 28
  • IMG_4191.png
    IMG_4191.png
    419.4 KB · Views: 30
Sorry I’m not entirely sure how to add the links. I’m not pushing either way on this either, I am just genuinely curious. I had had contacted initially bc it seamed approved but I seen the other after & am not taking any chance unless I know is safe. Thanks
@Sly26 - @AASraw is an approved source here, so you can be sure that they were subjected to the same scrutiny that all other sources experienced.

However, that does not mean that every one of their customers would be satisfied with their services.

This is okay, as no source is perfect, and as long as the source responds appropriately to the aggrieved customer then all is good.

But having dissatisfied customer(s) does not automatically qualify the source or any other source for that matter as a "scammer."

And in addition to this, Anabolex admin always follow-up on source complaints aired on threads to ensure that the source in question makes things right with the unhappy customer.

So, you can feel free to verify any source here from @AnaboleX-Dave or @Anabolex-G - if you are unsure about the validity of the source.
 
Your 'scammer' example was poor. The person cited in that image claimed the powder was 'inert' without proof. No testing etc. That a seller of raws would send the raw product which the buyer is required to process (oils etc) into a usable injectable seems kinda obvious
 

Similar threads

Top Bottom